Strength + Success Rankings

2025-2026 Girls' Flag Football Rankings

Last Updated: April 15, 2026 9:00 AM

Expanded Capsules for Top Teams

The Schedule Strength column ranks teams based on the average win percentage of their scheduled opponents.

The Strength + Success column combines the opponents' win percentage from the right with the team's own win percentage. Teams that perform better against opponents that perform better will rank higher.

These rankings are updated every morning and are based only on scores reported to CoachT.com.

Division I Class 2A

Strength + Success
1.McMinn County1.071
Strength of Schedule
1.McMinn County50.0%

District 2

Strength + Success
1.Hardin Valley1.500
2.Fulton1.202
3.Anderson County1.122
4.Carter1.119
5.Bearden1.079
6.Gibbs1.000
6.Karns1.000
6.Knoxville Halls1.000
6.West1.000
10.Knox Central0.938
11.Farragut0.820
12.South Doyle0.805
13.Austin-East0.542
14.Powell0.500
Strength of Schedule
1.Gibbs100.0%
1.Karns100.0%
1.Knoxville Halls100.0%
1.West100.0%
5.South Doyle80.5%
6.Farragut67.7%
7.Carter54.8%
8.Austin-East54.2%
9.Hardin Valley50.0%
9.Powell50.0%
11.Anderson County45.5%
12.Knox Central43.8%
13.Fulton20.2%
14.Bearden 7.9%

District 3

Strength + Success
1.Cleveland1.571
2.Coalfield1.175
3.Silverdale Academy1.000
Strength of Schedule
1.Cleveland57.1%
2.Coalfield31.7%
3.Silverdale Academy 0.0%

District 4

Strength + Success
1.Ooltewah1.571
2.Soddy Daisy1.286
3.Howard0.893
4.Brainerd0.500
Strength of Schedule
1.Howard89.3%
2.Ooltewah57.1%
3.Brainerd50.0%
4.Soddy Daisy28.6%

District 5

Strength + Success
1.Stone Memorial1.667
2.Warren County1.210
3.Gordonsville1.142
4.Cumberland County1.000
4.Van Buren County1.000
6.Rhea County0.881
7.Bledsoe County0.833
8.White County0.791
9.Smith County0.611
Strength of Schedule
1.Van Buren County100.0%
2.Rhea County88.1%
3.Bledsoe County83.3%
4.Stone Memorial66.7%
5.White County62.5%
6.Smith County61.1%
7.Warren County32.1%
8.Cumberland County16.7%
9.Gordonsville14.2%

District 6

Strength + Success
1.Blackman1.260
2.Rockvale1.153
3.Stewarts Creek1.076
4.Oakland0.972
5.Siegel0.945
6.Riverdale0.911
7.Smyrna0.903
8.LaVergne0.802
9.Murfreesboro Central Magnet0.748
Strength of Schedule
1.LaVergne63.5%
2.Smyrna53.9%
3.Rockvale52.8%
4.Oakland52.7%
5.Riverdale51.1%
6.Stewarts Creek45.1%
7.Siegel44.5%
8.Murfreesboro Central Magnet41.5%
9.Blackman37.1%

District 7

Strength + Success
1.Columbia0.889
Strength of Schedule
1.Columbia88.9%

District 8

Strength + Success
1.Page1.625
2.Independence1.432
3.Brentwood1.278
4.Franklin0.950
5.Nolensville0.500
Strength of Schedule
1.Page62.5%
2.Nolensville50.0%
3.Franklin45.0%
4.Independence43.2%
5.Brentwood27.8%

District 9

Strength + Success
1.Hendersonville1.714
2.Mt. Juliet1.668
3.Liberty Creek1.250
4.Gallatin1.167
5.Lebanon1.000
6.White House0.929
7.Watertown0.917
8.Station Camp0.905
9.Green Hill0.714
9.Portland0.714
11.Wilson Central0.364
Strength of Schedule
1.Lebanon100.0%
2.Watertown91.7%
3.Hendersonville71.4%
3.Green Hill71.4%
3.Portland71.4%
6.Mt. Juliet66.8%
7.Gallatin45.2%
8.White House42.9%
9.Wilson Central36.4%
10.Liberty Creek25.0%
11.Station Camp23.8%

District 10

Strength + Success
1.Hume-Fogg0.667
Strength of Schedule
1.Hume-Fogg66.7%

District 11

Strength + Success
1.Valor Collegiate0.722
2.KIPP Antioch Global0.500
3.KIPP - Nashville0.364
Strength of Schedule
1.Valor Collegiate72.2%
2.KIPP Antioch Global50.0%
3.KIPP - Nashville36.4%

District 12

Strength + Success
1.Cheatham County0.667
2.Harpeth0.333
Strength of Schedule
1.Cheatham County66.7%
2.Harpeth33.3%

District 13

Strength + Success
1.White House Heritage0.833
2.East Robertson0.750
Strength of Schedule
1.White House Heritage83.3%
2.East Robertson75.0%

District 14

Strength + Success
1.Kirkwood0.889
Strength of Schedule
1.Kirkwood88.9%

District 16

Strength + Success
1.Millington1.000
1.MASE1.000
1.Southwind1.000
1.Whitehaven1.000
Strength of Schedule
1.MASE100.0%
1.Southwind100.0%
1.Whitehaven100.0%
4.Millington 0.0%